The government wants you to believe your health insurance costs are falling. But walk into any clinic or review your premiums, and the truth is obvious: you’re paying more and getting less. This article breaks down how the system manipulates data, distorts inflation numbers, and makes healthcare unaffordable — even when you’re insured.
"The price hikes are real. The only thing falling is the government's credibility."
This summary is based on the video published by Heresy Financial, which outlines how health insurance is deceptively reported in CPI data and what that means for your wallet.
📢 About This Summary
Summary based on a Heresy Financial video — edited and annotated by Time Health Capital. Our team watches, distills, and reacts to leading content to bring you clear, actionable insights.
“The price hikes are real. The only thing falling is the government's credibility.”
Source / Watch: Heresy Financial — Are Health Insurance Costs Falling?
📝 Summary of Key Points (from Heresy Financial)
Official inflation measures show health insurance costs easing, but those figures mask how the government measures insurance components (claims-paid & insurer margins) rather than household premium burden. In practice families are paying higher premiums, facing larger deductibles, and experiencing surprise bills — outcomes that aren't fully captured in CPI calculations. Meanwhile insurers push for big rate increases, and many providers and patients are experimenting with alternatives like Direct Primary Care or self-funding to avoid opaque pricing and rising costs.
💸 Why Your Costs Keep Rising While the Government Claims They're Falling
Families now routinely face annual healthcare costs well above $20,000–$25,000 for household coverage when you include premiums, deductibles and out-of-pocket spending. At the same time, headline CPI may show insurance-related components declining because the metric tracks insurer payout rates and claim-cost flows — not the premium and deductible pain experienced by households.
Insurers requesting 20–27% rate hikes for upcoming plan years is a leading indicator: the strain on families is real and growing despite what aggregate statistics suggest.
🎩 The Measurement Trick
The core distortion is measurement: CPI health-insurance components can register as "lower" when insurers pay out more in claims or when margins compress — because that makes insurer costs move, not consumer premiums. Politicians then point to that data to say health costs are moderating, while the pocketbook reality (premiums, deductibles, surprise bills) gets worse for many families.
This allows policymakers to claim progress on inflation while households continue to shoulder higher medical bills.
🚨 It's Not Just Expensive — It's Broken
Insurance complexity creates perverse incentives: higher negotiated rates, surprise out-of-network charges, and layered deductibles. Patients frequently discover that coverage doesn't equal affordable care — especially for episodic or specialist services. For many, "having insurance" now means paying more and getting less access to transparent, predictable pricing.
- ❗ Surprise billing even with coverage
- ❗ Separate deductibles and confusing out-of-network rules
- ❗ Rising co-pays and increasing reliance on high-deductible plans
🔄 The Quiet Revolt: Direct Care & Self-Funding
As friction grows, alternative models are expanding. Healthy individuals increasingly negotiate direct-pay rates; physicians are moving to membership-based Direct Primary Care (DPC) models; and some families are prefunding care themselves with dedicated savings rather than relying on opaque insurer pricing. These shifts reflect a desire for transparency, lower transaction costs, and predictable access — even if they don’t suit everyone.
💡 Self-Insurance: The DIY Healthcare Fund
Some households and small businesses are choosing to self-insure for routine care while buying catastrophic coverage. By putting premium savings into a dedicated health fund, they gain flexibility and can often negotiate better rates. This approach requires discipline and risk tolerance, but for many it beats escalating premiums and confusing coverage rules.
💬 Dr. Ozoude’s Commentary
❓ Questions & Implications for Our Readers
- How should families evaluate the trade-off between high-deductible plans and predictable membership-based primary care?
- What portion of premium savings should be redirected into a dedicated health fund for those considering self-insurance?
- For physicians: is a Direct Primary Care model a viable path to reduce administrative burden and improve patient access in your practice?
▶ Prefer to Watch?
Watch the full Heresy Financial video that inspired this commentary:
💡 Talk directly with Dr. Ozoude at Time Health Capital.
Schedule a Call with Dr. Ozoude
© All original content, trademarks, and media referenced herein belong to their respective creators. This article is a third-party summary created by Time Health Capital for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, medical, or legal advice. Always do your own research and consult qualified advisors before making decisions.
The mismatch between headline statistics and real consumer pain is something I see every day. Patients tell me they are paying more out of pocket despite "stable" inflation readings — and that disconnect matters. From a clinical and financial standpoint, this is about choices: how do you preserve access to care without surrendering financial independence? For many physicians and families, simpler models — transparent pricing, membership care for primary needs, and targeted catastrophic insurance for big risks — make more sense than the complex, opaque system we tolerate. Practically speaking, prioritize clear contracts with providers, build a health-specific savings buffer, and consider membership-based primary care if you value predictability and time back in your week.